logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.11 2017고정1646
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven B K5 cars under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.218% in the direction of “water flow flown,” located in the same 2km-dong, via a yellow four distance from the street located in the same road on the front of “persons fluencing in the Geum-gu Geum-dong, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, on the road; and (b) the Defendant driven B K5 cars under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.218% in the direction of “water flown,” located in the same 2km-dong.

2. The Defendant is a person who operates a vehicle B K5 vehicle on the road in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident).

On July 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:45, and stopped the front of the yellow-distance road in the Yellow-gu Yellow-gu, Daegu, Daegu, on the two-lane from the center of children's center to the two-lane, which is the right-hand left-hand one among the five-lanes on the right-hand two-lanes from the center of children's center, but went straight ahead of the two two-lanes in accordance with the straight line of the above intersection, and changed the course to the three-lane.

At the same time, there was a vehicle driving along each other, so if the driver intends to change the course of the vehicle to a person who operates the vehicle, the driver has a duty of care to prevent the accident due to the failure of changing the course, if there is a possibility of hindering the normal traffic of other vehicles running in the direction of the change.

In such a situation, the Defendant, by negligence in violation of this provision, was driving by a victim C (50) who is in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s vehicle in the same direction as that of the Defendant.

D Launaina Corporation contact the left part of the taxi with the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the amount of KRW 1,412,888 at the repairing cost, such as the taxi exchange, etc. on the left side of the taxi, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking measures against the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.

arrow