logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.04.15 2015고단4047
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a cro-car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.093% at a section of approximately 500 meters from the 500-meter alcohol level to the 621st road of the Gu, Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si around the Gu, Ansan-si to the upper end of the same city to the 621st day of the month.

2. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties without permission, at the center of the 621 central government of Ansan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, 621.

The Defendant, who was working on the duty of drinking alcohol control at that place, was able to take care of not allowing the above unauthorized crossing from the slope D belonging to the traffic control department of the Franchi Police Station, and to issue a traffic penalty notice to the unauthorized crossing. The Defendant, who is demanded to get up to the safe India, is why the fluent s are being raised, and that the fluent s are raised.

놔! 이 좆같은 새끼들 아 죽여 버리겠다" 라며 욕을 하고, 몸으로 D의 몸을 밀치고 손바닥으로 D의 가슴을 밀쳐 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officials on public peace and order maintenance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, G, and H;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant (including DNA statements);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement in the preparation of E, F, G, and H;

1. Report of the circumstances of driving and notification of the result of the crackdown on drinking driving (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not have a public official D in the police who is performing official duties.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., police officials D who are performing official duties, consistently from the investigation agency to this court, and there is a defect in the defendant's desire to urge him to impose a penalty on the unauthorized defendant.

(2) work together with D at the time.

arrow