All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

The court below dismissed all the application for compensation filed by the applicant for compensation at the court below.

An applicant for compensation cannot file an objection against a judgment dismissing an application for compensation pursuant to Article 32(4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings. Therefore, the part dismissing the application for compensation among the judgment below shall be excluded from the scope of adjudication

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

The punishment of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

On November 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act on November 15, 2020; and (b) obtained the police investigation on January 15, 2020, the means of access linked to the company bank account in the name of the limited company that it transferred to "T" did not suspend the use of the said account; and (c) on February 2, 2020, the Defendant re-established and transferred the means of access connected to the said company's bank account to "T" to "T" without suspending the use of the said account; and (d) withdrawn the amount of damage from the said company's account to "T" on March 2, 2020; and (e) delivered it directly to "T". Each of the instant crimes by the Defendant did not constitute a crime related to the so-called "wishing" by planned and organizational means to the majority victims; and (e) did not cause serious damage to the social order of the public; and (e) the Defendant’s withdrawal and transfer of the means of access to 1000.