1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In relation (i) The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the D Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) on April 12, 2015, following the diagnosis by the C Hospital located in the vicinity of the accident site due to a single accident that occurred during the operation of the two-wheeled Motor Vehicle on April 12, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the D Hospital on the same day (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

Dol Defendant is a legal entity that operates the Defendant hospital in charge of treating the Plaintiff.

B. (i) On April 13, 2015, after the Plaintiff transferred to the Defendant Hospital, the Defendant Hospital performed metal scraping surgery within the Alley River (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) on the right troke and the left trokes after the Plaintiff’s entrance into the Defendant Hospital, and there was no observation on the progress of the surgery.

She, however, X-ray conducted after the operation, was normally carried out, but damage was confirmed in the upper left-hand emeral emerculation as a result of the examination conducted on May 11, 2015.

On June 11, 2015, the Defendant Hospital conducted an additional pre-service inspection. From the surgery to the discharge on August 18, 2015, the Defendant Hospital provided rehabilitation treatment to the Plaintiff, etc., and conducted the second pre-service inspection on December 28, 2015, which was after the discharge.

C. The Plaintiff’s current state (i.e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.

B. The Plaintiff’s work ability to apply 32.3% after considering that the damaged part is the left-hand side while applying the occupational disability coefficient of “general outdoor workers” under the Mabrod Labor Capacity Evaluation Table.