logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.07 2015나52331
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 5, 2012, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Indonesian Hospital operated by the Defendant on December 6, 2012 (hereinafter “Indonesian Hospital”).

B. As a result of a close inspection conducted with respect to the Plaintiff, the Gidong Hospital confirmed on December 7, 2012 that the upper part of the Alley part was serious and there was a symptoms of Epic mathy, and subsequently, on December 7, 2012, the Gidong Hospital performed a “dive and mecopical surgery” (hereinafter “the instant surgery”).

C. On December 13, 2012, I explained that the Plaintiff was in the normal course of recovery after the instant surgery, and that on December 13, 2012, the Plaintiff was released from the hospital, and that he was well worn with the neck and auxiliary equipment after the discharge.

On December 21, 2012, 2012, the Gidong Hospital confirmed that the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part.

E. On January 4, 2013 and January 28, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) applied to a female-style hospital to undergo tracking treatment; (b) the Plaintiff conducted tracking radiation inspections on the two occasions; and (c) it was confirmed that the bones of the pelvise was being formed in a state where the bones of the pelvise was laid down, as a result of tracking radiation inspections on the Plaintiff.

F. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from December 29, 2012 to September 11, 2013 due to the continued pain on the part of the surgery, from the time of the Plaintiff’s medical examination and treatment on several occasions, the Plaintiff’s name was the body frame, the closedness, and the bones of the dead body.

arrow