A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:50, the 104-dong 1401 of the Gunsan Police Station C District, which was called up after receiving a report from 112, should be checked as to whether the Defendant was fine because he received a report of domestic violence.

If there is a denial, anywhere

“On the ground that the Defendant’s wife in the house and in the house was “Aussian and Bobsian”, he expressed his motive as “Aussiane”, and brupted the head of D with his hair, and brupted the brupt and brupted the brush, and the brupt D used the face of D with the Defendant when he was brue and blue blue.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The mitigated area (i.e., interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) / (i.e., January to August 8) where the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is minor (i.e., assault, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties) (i.e., a special mitigated person] / the nature of the crime of this case in which the defendant used violence against the police officer who performed official duties is minor; however, the nature of the crime of this case in which the defendant used violence against the police officer who performed official duties is minor; however, the fact that the defendant is recognized and against the mistake; the fact that the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the fine is favorable should be considered in light of favorable circumstances;