logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.10.13 2016나7331
손해배상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when the judgment is used or added as follows.

2. Each “ro” of the pages 14, 15, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is used or added, shall be raised to “rawls”.

At the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 6th line at the bottom is as follows.

In addition, the defendant added "Health Team," and "A evidence No. 5" to "Health Team," and "the plaintiff shall be added to the plaintiff, 54,759,600 (if all damages claimed by the plaintiff are added, 54,849,600 won shall be added, but only 54,759,600 won shall be claimed in the application form for change of the lawsuit and change of the cause of the claim on June 15, 2016) of the first instance judgment."

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to "On the other hand," and "written evidence No. 6" between "On the other hand," and "written argument."

In Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance, the part 9 of the judgment " is in existence," and the part 9 of the defendant " shall be added, apart from the fact that the plaintiff makes an extradition request to the defendant."

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow