Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

B operates the clothing store "D" on the floor of Seoul C market, and is elected by the representative of E management body, and the defendant was a person who was a managing body of the whole E management body as a sectional owner of the land floor.

On March 30, 2018, at the ordinary general meeting of the above E E E management body, the Defendant thought that B, supported by himself, changed the voting paper for the purpose of getting elected.

At around 11:00 on the same day, the Defendant entered the ballot paper No. 10 and No. 11 in 2(B) in the process of selecting representatives of the E management body conducted by the G Center located in Seoul F, during the ordinary general meeting of 2018, the Defendant entered the ballot paper No. 10 and No. 11.

As a result, the defendant altered ballot papers for the purpose of winning B, and interfered with the election of representatives at the regular meeting of the E management body by deceptive means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. An investigation report (or telephone conversations between a witness submitted with a written confirmation), a criminal investigation report ( telephone conversations between a witness and a witness), a criminal investigation report (K telephone conversations of a witness), and a criminal investigation report ( telephone conversations of a witness);

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. A copy of each altered ballot paper;

1. On January 1, 2018, the minutes of the ordinary meeting of the E and the defendant and the defense counsel submitted the following: (i) in relation to the ballot paper 10, the defendant corrected the "1" recorded in the ballot paper to "2" and recorded the "B" name; (ii) in relation to the ballot paper 11, the defendant prepared and submitted it at the request of the voter, not by correction, but by the voting witness; and (iii) in relation to the ballot paper 11, the defendant was prepared and submitted at the request of the voters, and then the group of persons additionally stated "1". Thus, the defendant interfered with the business by altering each of the above ballot papers.