logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정195
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the president of the “E Housing Redevelopment Project Partnership” being promoted in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu D, and the chairperson of the promotion committee or the project implementer (in the case of a partnership, the executive officers of the partnership), such as the operating rules and the articles of association of the promotion committee for the implementation of the rearrangement project, the minutes of the general meeting of the partnership and the board of directors and the board of representatives of the partnership, and the official documents, etc. concerning the implementation of the relevant rearrangement project shall be made public in parallel with the Internet and other methods within 15 days after the preparation or modification thereof

1. Nevertheless, in amending Article 14(1)(3) of the Association’s articles of association at an ordinary general meeting of the E Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Office located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, on February 22, 2013, the Defendant changed “two auditors” to “auditor 1-2,” and did not disclose the amended articles of association within 15 days via the Internet and other methods.

2. On March 14, 2013, the Defendant, at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around March 14, 2013, held a board of directors on four occasions in 2013, and prepared the minutes of the board of directors, and did not disclose within 15 days the minutes of the board of directors of the association in parallel with the Internet and other means

3. On June 5, 2015, the Defendant prepared an official document regarding the implementation of a rearrangement project at the place specified in paragraph (1) around June 5, 2015, “an application for the modification of the E-Upgrade and the designation of the rearrangement zone,” and did not disclose the written official document in parallel with the Internet and other means within 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 86 of the Act and Article 86 subparagraph 6 of the Act on the Maintenance of Dwelling Conditions for the Urban and Residential Environments, and Articles 81 (1) and 81 of the Act, and the selection of fines for crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow