logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.12.15 2015고정151
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle at C in low-speed as a duty.

On April 3, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 10:40 on April 3, 2015, while driving the vehicle on a one-lane road at the direction of the police box of a spoke in a regular Eup.

On the same side, it became left left at the intersection of overland.

At that time, the traffic has been controlled by signal apparatus, so the person engaged in driving of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the signal.

Nevertheless, due to negligence in violation of signal, the part concerning the left-hand side of the driver's vehicle and the part concerning the front-hand part of the damaged vehicle, which interfered with the progress of the victim D (ma, 47 years old) driving in accordance with the new code on the left-hand side of the driver's vehicle.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, injury to the victim D, such as dives typile in need of treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim F (V, South and 47 years old) of the victim of the damaged vehicle, including salt ties and tensions, which require treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Medical certificate (D), medical certificate (F);

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow