Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 06:20 on December 9, 2012, the Defendant driven a passenger car with B B, and driven the front road of the 1823 male market mooring site in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the station.

In this case, the defendant who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle that is driven by living well on the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not properly see the separation stand in the central line due to negligence while neglecting this, and received the front part and the part of the side of the D urban bus driven by the victim C (Name and 52 years old) who gets involved in the opposite part as the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, from the victim E (ma), the victim E (ma), who was on board the front seat of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle for about two weeks of medical treatment; the victim F (V, 40 years of age) who was on board the rear seat for about five weeks of medical treatment; and the victim G (ma, 26 years of age) who was on board the rear seat for about two weeks of medical treatment; and the victim G (ma, 26 years of age) who was on board the rear seat for about two weeks of medical treatment; and the victim’s Ha (H and 27 years of age) who was on board the bus driven by the victim C, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning video recording devices;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Reasons for not less than Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;