A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of the Criminal Team of the Yasan Police Station located in 165-12, Yasan-ro, Yasan-si, Yasan-do, Yasan-do, 165-12, demanded that the Defendant unfastened the Defendant’s friendly B’s locks arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, and demanded that the Defendant unfastened into the Defendant’s friendly B’s wall under investigation, and taken the Defendant out of the office of the police officer who belongs to the above police station

Since then, the Defendant tried to see the police officers' restraint and again enter the criminal team office, and Doctrine D, who was in front of the entrance of the Yansan Police Station C District District, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the transfer and investigation of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;