logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.03 2014고단2058
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

A. The summary of the facts charged is that there is a need to issue a balance certificate in order to acquire F from the representative director E of D (hereinafter “D”), and upon the request of the bond company to obtain a balance certificate by temporarily borrowing the money from the bond company, the Defendant received a balance certificate from the representative director H of G (hereinafter “G”), but failed.

The certificate of balance was forged and issued to E using a balance certificate of the national bank account in the name of G (hereinafter referred to as the “certificate of balance”).

A. On September 1, 2013, around 09:00 on September 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) added the number “*50,014,461,214” to the deposit trust column of the instant balance certificate within the Jran-do passenger car parked in the head of the I University Hospital located in Yongsan-gu Seoul; and (b) added the number “8.30” at the date of issuance of the certificate to the number “8.30” on the date of issuance of the certificate; and (c) added it to the near door room.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the balance certificate in the name of the former branch office of the National Bank Co., Ltd., a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On September 1, 2013, the Defendant, at around 10:00, issued one copy of the forged balance certificate from the first floor of the building of the K Accounting Corporation located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as if it were a genuine document to E, etc., and thereafter exercised the above investigation document by having the above E, etc. submit it to L person in charge of merger of the K Accounting Corporation at that time.

2. A summary of the change of the defendant and his defense counsel (1) The defendant did not forge the certificate of the balance of this case.

(2) Upon request of H, the Defendant issued the instant balance certificate with “0 won” and delivered it to M., and thereafter, requested the Defendant to submit the document envelope containing the M M to the K accounting corporation, and the Defendant sent the document envelope to the K accounting corporation upon request of M.

arrow