A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 190"

1. On November 20, 2014, the Defendant forged an official document: (a) at an office located in Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter referred to as Pyeongtaek-si) around November 20, 2014; (b) when one’s identification card was no longer available to enter the casino, the Defendant: (c) opened the casino with a cell phone number that he/she became aware of through the Internet search; (d) opened the phone number B with the phone number; and (e) caused the person who was not aware of it to forge B’

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the driver’s license issued by the Commissioner of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, a public document, in the above manner.

2. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) presented a forged driver’s license as if he were actually issued to C, at the entrance and search stand at the entrance of a casino in the Gangwon-do, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, and exercised it.

On October 1, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million on October 11, 2013 to a fine of KRW 3 million in the same court as a fine of KRW 1,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

On January 25, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant driven a D EcooS car without obtaining a driver's license from approximately 50 meters from the front of the Western Station located in Pyeongtaek-si to the front road, and without obtaining a driver's license from around 50 meters in the front road.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 190]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The protocol of seizure and the list of seizure of the police [20, group 274];

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiries about criminal records, etc. and a copy of each summary order;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Article 229 and Article 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of counterfeited official document), Article 225 of the same Act;