logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.02.07 2014고정40
범인도피
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant A, while under the influence of alcohol around 05:38, around August 24, 2013, driven C strawing car at approximately 500 meters on the road before the 365-51st of the 365-51st of the Hannam-si Fungdong 349 Empire convenience store, under the influence of alcohol content 0.16%.

B. Defendant A stated that he driven the said car at a non-driving place around that time was discovered by neighboring D’s report, and that he driven the said car to conceal it. On August 29, 2013, Defendant A had B make a false statement to the effect that B driven the said car at the guard of the lower police station in the Hasan-dong, Hasan-dong, Haak-dong, Hanam-dong, and the Transport Investigation Team office, which caused B to escape the person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. On August 29, 2013, Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that Defendant B was a person who moved or parked a vehicle A from a slope E belonging to the above police station without driving a vehicle of the Party A, and that he was a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, on the following grounds: (a) around October 10:26, 2013, Hansan-nam Police Station guarded 74-5, Hansan-dong, Hansan-dong, and the Transport Investigation Team office; and (b) Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that he

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement of the defendant B;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Each written statement of the D and Defendant A;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV closure photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving a sound driving, the choice of fines), Articles 151 (1) and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of allowing delivery of a person and the choice of fines);

B. Defendant B: Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

arrow