logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.12.18 2015노1234
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a net manner and committed the instant crime in depth.

In addition, the defendant agreed with the victim D, H, and expressed his intention not to punish the defendant, and the court below and the trial court made a criminal deposit of the prescribed amount of money (six million won in total) for the victim F.

In addition, the instant crime ought to be considered in relation to the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, which became final and conclusive in September 2, 2015 and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the Defendant appears to be willing to scrap and not drive a motor vehicle after the instant crime, etc., which are favorable to the Defendant in the course of the determination of the sentence against the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case does not take any measures to ensure that the Defendant driven a car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.131% at the latest at night while driving on the road while driving on the road, and does not take any measures to get the victim D driver's vehicle driven at the same vehicle line at the same time. The act of this case runs away without taking any measures to get the victim's D driver's vehicle driven at the same vehicle line at the above site. The act of this case was committed by receiving the victim's f driver's vehicle driven at the normal driving on the same line at approximately 2.5 km at the above site and causing the above victim's injury to the F and the winners H, which is revealed in the danger of the act, and the punishment of illegality

In addition, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the appellate court was proceeding due to the instant fraud case.

Furthermore, the Defendant was unable to receive suspicion from the Victim F.

In addition, the defendant has three times criminal punishment due to driving-related crimes, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, and motive for the crime.

arrow