A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from February 15, 2006 to February 2, 2006, purchased four insurance contracts with the victim Hansung Life Insurance Co., Ltd. from 4 places in an insurance company, such as non-dividend Medibur health insurance, respectively. On February 21, 2008, D hospitals located in Gunsan City C, even if hospitalization is necessary as a minor injury, it is unnecessary for a long-term and short-term hospitalization. However, even if hospitalization is necessary, the Defendant could receive treatment with only short-term hospitalization. However, on March 14, 2008, the Defendant was pretended to have conducted hospital treatment under the name of “Mane-free Mane-free Maebroci certificate” for 21 days from 208, and received insurance proceeds from the victim AI life insurance company to 30 days from 19 March 2008, 200, 40 days from 205 days from 200 and 40 days from 205 days from 200.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A reply to a request for deliberation on whether the hospitalization of the Health Insurance Review Board is appropriate (including those additionally submitted on the date of a public trial on January 25, 2017);

1. Claims for each insurance proceeds and medical records;

1. Answer to the request for investigation by the Financial Supervisory Service;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the current status of insurance coverage), report internal investigation (a statement of damage inflicted on an insurance company, a statement of opinion, etc.), and report internal investigation (the current status of payment of insurance proceeds);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. The Defendant’s summary of the assertion is, in fact, in need of hospitalization.