1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal of the following parts. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

(a) On the third page of the first instance judgment, each “Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology” in the 5th and 1th 3th 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

B. From Nos. 13 to 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be followed.

"㈑ 이 사건 사업은 해외 수요처 연계 기술개발사업으로서 해외 수요처로부터 제품개발을 요청받고, 개발 완료 후에는 해외 수요처에 그 결과물을 판매하는 계약이 체결된 중소기업이 지원대상이며(을 제8호증), 이에 원고도 과제신청시 사업계획서와 함께 해외수요처 연계 기술개발 과제 제안서(을 제11호증) 및 매매계약서(갑 제8호증)를 제출하였다.

In the instant business plan No. 16 submitted by the Plaintiff to the Defendant, “A” of the instant business plan refers to “the development of a brush which combines the sound of sound suitable for the room and IM-type brush and the function of waterproofing and waterproof.” In addition, a detailed plan for the development of technology, such as all the institutional elements necessary for the development of technology as above, electricity, and electronic elements, is listed.

In addition, at the time of the submission of the instant project plan, the Plaintiff emphasizes that the failure of product development pursuant to the instant project task depends on securing a considerable part of waterproof performance. The Plaintiff’s waterproof function and waterproof function of the spacker principal body.