1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or replacement of a part of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

가. 제3면 아래에서 제6행의 “Ⅱ구역의 개발사업시행자로 하여금”을 삭제하고, 같은 면 아래에서 제3행의 “‘O’이라 한다)”부터 아래에서 제2행의 “확장하도록 하였다”까지의 부분을 “’O‘이라 한다)의 서쪽 폭 4m의 사유지 659.20㎡(≒ 폭 4m × 길이 165m)를 확보하여 O의 폭을 12m로 확장할 것을 결정하였다”로 고쳐 쓴다.

(b) Part 5 of Part 5, “Written Elimination of Sea” was submitted to “Woyang (Woyang) Amendment and Woyang Declaration,” and the part 6 to 7 of the said part of the said part is used to read “the 4m portion is purchased, and the 4m portion is donated,” “the right to use (the right to use).” Under the same part, the 3m portion “ underground 13m” was changed to read “the 13m above the ground level.”

(c) Parts 7 and 4 [based grounds for recognition] add “A evidence 6 and A evidence 7-3.”

Part 21, Part 10, “A” is added in front of this Court to “A” or “A” 16(including a serial number) to 17.

3. If so, the plaintiffs' lawsuits in this case are dismissed in its entirety, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.