beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.
provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A’s violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. and the Promotion of respective Game Industry Act, the Defendant installed a “marine outdoor game” game machine, which is a game product not rated by the Game Rating Board, and operated a speculative act, and took charge of duties such as management of customers and exchange, etc. in the game room for the operation of the E
From August 2012, 2012 to September 2012, the Defendant committed a crime, even though no one provides a game not rated by the Game Rating Board for use. From August 2012, 2012 to September 2012, the Defendant installed 2nd class E game in the Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, G 2nd class E in the Cheongju-si, G 2nd class in the Cheongju-si, and 30 games with the “sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea” game without being rated as an example and a chain-to-face. The Defendant provided customers with 10,000 won input the game in the said game machine to start the game, and then the customers paid cash according to the points that they acquired in the game process.
As a result, the defendant provided game products without rating in collusion with E for use, and operated speculative acts using speculative gaming machines.
B. From Sep. 2012 to Oct. 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) no one provided a game not classified by the Game Rating Board for the use of the game products; (b) around Sept. 2012 to Oct. 2012, 2012, the Defendant installed 30 games of the “sea-to-sea-to-sea” game machine, which was one of the instant game instruments, and did not receive an example and strawing function, in a Cheongju-si from Sept. 2012 to Oct. 2012; and (c) provided customers with 10,000 won input the game in the instant game machine to start the game; and (d) paid cash to customers according to the points that they acquired by chancely during the game process.
Accordingly, the defendant did not receive a grade in collusion with E.