(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.09.09 2019고단4226

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.09.09 2019고단4226

업무방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from September 2, 2019 to September 13:37, 2019, to September 15:2, 2019, as D managed by the Victim C (V, 61 years of age) located in Gwangju Northern-gu B, “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

The military service system shall be discarded to a household;

The mountain burial damage has been done.

Chosia, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine and 50 minutes, and Doctrine.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. 112 case settlement table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (at the time of withdrawal);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and reasons for sentencing under Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one to five years;

2. Scope of recommendation [decision of types] according to the sentencing criteria: Prohibition of Interference with Business: [Type 1] There is no interference with business [the scope of recommendation field and recommendation range], basic area (the scope of recommendation field and recommendation range], and six months to one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment; and

4. The defendant's reasons for sentencing committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he did not agree with the victim even though he was in the period of suspension of execution, that he did not recover from damage, that he was punished for the same kind of crime, that there was a lot of records of punishment due to violent crimes, etc., and that he did not appear on the trial date despite being aware that the trial procedure is in progress, and the punishment as stated in the order shall be determined by taking into account all the factors such as the circumstance and process leading up to the crime of this case, degree of obstruction

참조조문

-형법 제314조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2015.12.02 2015고단3456

-부산지방법원 2017.8.11.선고 2016고단5453 판결

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.10.27 2016고단1015

-인천지방법원 2020.05.28 2020고단2806

-서울동부지방법원 2019.11.25 2019고단1966