logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.05.11 2015고합380
준강간미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Gohap 380"

1. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the victim E was seated on the roadside in front of the Dhop house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, on or around 02:20 on October 20, 2015, and that the victim E was able to sit in the roadside under the influence of alcohol, leaving the flusium into the alley, leaving the flusium into the flusium, leaving the victim flusium, and leaving the flusium ( CHAPTER 1, 10,000 won KRW 50,00 KRW 1,00 KRW 10,00 KRW) and gift certificates equivalent to KRW 15,00 KRW 15,00 (Chapter 1,00 KRW 5,00 KRW 5,00 KRW 1) owned by the victim.

In other words, the victim's property was stolen by inserting the money on the part of the defendant.

2. The Defendant attempted quasi-rape, at the time, at the time, at the place under the preceding paragraph, and at the same time, at the time, at the above victim E (influence, 21 years old), had the victim feel her to engage in sexual intercourse by taking advantage of an impossible state of resistance, and continued to have the victim get her seat and tried to have sexual intercourse with the victim, but the police officer dispatched upon receiving a report of the Defendant’s commission of the Defendant, was aware of the Defendant’s conduct.

The Defendant 2018 Gohap 8, Nov. 20, 2017, by causing the Defendant, who was sitting on the floor to listen to the statements related to the details of the report by the police station of the Seoul Northern Police Station that was called out after receiving a report from 112 that he she sat around 00:15, a guest satisfing at “G main points” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu., Seoul, the Defendant 201 and then caused the Defendant to satisf on the floor so as to hear the statements related to the report.

“A person who is asked to see, without any reason, assaulted the left face of the H at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Gohap 380"

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The records and photographs of seizure;

1. A criminal investigation report (1) and an investigation report (2018 Gohap 8).

1. Statement of the defendant in the third public trial records;

1. Each police statement made to K and H;

1. H. The damaged police officers;

arrow