A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a merchandise coupon exchange company in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim E was seeking to operate a merchandise coupon exchange shopping mall in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F with the trade name of "G for the settlement of the merchandise coupon exchange".

I are people.

1. On August 6, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim on August 6, 2014 with the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul F for the capital and a contract that issues transportation cards, merchandise coupons, etc. in a lot.

It is intended to establish a merchandise coupon exchange system and shopping mall website, purchase system, mobile web and maintenance and management system at the face of KRW 40 million.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the fact that the defendant did not have entered into a loan and contract, and there was no ability to build a merchandise coupon exchange system and shopping mall website, purchase system, mobile web and maintenance system.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was remitted KRW 30 million on August 6, 2014 from the victim, and KRW 10 million on September 1, 2014 from the victim.

2. On September 2014, the Defendant, including computers, received 11.2 million won from the injured party in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and received the purchase price of the non- gift certificates from the injured party in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and received 1.40 million won 5,00 won 5,00 won 10,000 won 80 won , and 50,000 won 50,00 won 50 won , and had H, a program developer, enter the purchase price of the non- gift certificates into the G.

On October 10, 2014, the Defendant filed an application with H for the transfer of 50,000 won 50,000 won 10,00 won / 50,00 won / 10,00 won / 50 of / 10,00 won with the gift certificates type of gift certificates received from capital.

“The” application was sent as a mail.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any authority with respect to the transfer of the gale, and the Defendant deceiving H as if he had no authority, even though he did not have obtained the consent of the victim, and caused H to do so, the amount of KRW 150,000,000,000 in total, KRW 1250,000,000,000,000 won for the gale gift certificates.