logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.10.21 2016가단14371
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s order based on the payment order issued on February 26, 2016 by the Incheon District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts are either disputed between the parties, or acknowledged based on Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, and 2, and the whole purport of the arguments and arguments. A.

The Defendant is a management body comprised of sectional owners of B department stores located in Seocheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant department stores”) (hereinafter “instant department stores”).

B. On July 17, 2015, the Plaintiff acquired Subparag. 70, 71, and 72 from among the department stores of this case (hereinafter “each of Subparag. 70”, “No. 71”, and “No. 72”) at a voluntary auction.

C. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant applied for the payment of unpaid management expenses of KRW 2,246,00 for the Plaintiff from January 201 to December 2015, KRW 180,40 for the unpaid management expenses of KRW 2,776,300 for the period from April 2008 to December 2015, KRW 378,00 for the overdue charges of KRW 378,00 for the unpaid management expenses of KRW 72 from June 2007 to December 2015 (i.e., KRW 4,133,300 for the unpaid management expenses of KRW 981,200, KRW 10,000 for the Defendant, KRW 2,695,00 for the unpaid management expenses of KRW 180,000, KRW 270,076, KRW 308,308,301,305,206.36,204.

As of October 4, 2016, the unpaid management expenses for the section for common use before the Defendant’s acquisition of ownership is KRW 1,845,800 for the stores under subparagraph 70, KRW 2,376,100 for the stores under subparagraph 71, KRW 3,733,100 for the stores under subparagraph 72, and KRW 400 for the unpaid management expenses and late fees for the section for common use and exclusive use from the date of the Defendant’s acquisition of ownership to December 2015 for each of the stores under this case.

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant.

arrow