logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.12.22 2017고단671
전자금융거래법위반
Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be four million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Height 671] No person may transfer an access medium unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts in using and managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on June 12, 2017, the Defendant accepted the communication that “I would pay KRW 200,000 each day when the account number and password is known to the police officer,” and applied for a transaction in a non-media media that can cash withdrawal without a card or passbook from the National Bank in the name of the Defendant (number B is indicated as “AH,” but the account number is clearly indicated as “B” in light of evidence records, etc. in light of evidence records, etc., the Defendant informed him/her of the account number and password of “B” (if such recognition does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense), and then applied for a transaction at the National Bank in the Dong-dong-dong, Ansan-dong, without the card or passbook.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the electronic information corresponding to the electronic identification card, which is a medium access to electronic financial transactions, and the password necessary to use such information.

[2017 Height 835] No person may lend an access medium with the receipt, demand or promise of consideration in using and managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on June 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the Buddhist Bank in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, stating that “I will lend our bank account to 200,000 won each day; and (b) received a total of KRW 508,000 from the 26th to the 28th of the same month from the 28th of the same month to the 28th of the same month.”

Accordingly, the defendant lent the approaching media while receiving and promising the consideration.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 671]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police officer for D and E.

arrow