A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 6. 23. 23:30경 충남 태안군 소원면 서해로 753-1 32번 국도 상에서 술 냄새를 풍기며 비상등을 켠 채로 C 매그너스 승용차를 정차하고 있다가 순찰 중이던 서산경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E 등에 의해 도로교통법위반(음주운전)죄로 현행범인 체포되었다.

1. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2015. 6. 24. 00:11경 충남 태안군 F에 있는 서산경찰서 D파출소에서 위 파출소 소속 경위 E으로부터 호흡측정기에 의한 음주측정 또는 혈액채취에 의한 음주측정에 관한 질문을 받던 중 갑자기 “니들 마음대로 해라, 이 시발놈들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 발로 위 E의 왼쪽 다리부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

2. On June 24, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) and was demanded to comply with the measurement of alcohol in a manner of inserting alcohol in the manner of inserting alcohol in the office of the traffic survey department of the Seosan Police Station located in the Eup/Myeon of Seosan-si, Seosan-si, as seen above, while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking smell, reding on face, walking, and walking.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, rejected photographs of measurement, and vice versa to damaged police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), Articles 148-2(1)2 and 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of refusal of measurement of noise), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;