logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.04.08 2020고합6
일반자동차방화등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “200 Mump6,” was employed as a driver of D 25.2 tons of dump truck, which was entered by B in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and was not paid wages for three months from B, which was not paid for around November 17, 2019, by the owner of the land, and was fump truck.

On November 17, 2019, at around 03:50 on November 17, 2019, the Defendant: (a) dump trucks owned by the victim company located at the front hole E, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) dump trucks owned by the victim company; (c) dump dump trucks, which were kept in the front of the tump truck’s personal string line, 1.5 Lump trucks; and (d) dumped the gasoline, which was stored in the tump truck’s personal string line, with the studs and driver’s seat of the

As a result, the Defendant destroyed all parts of the front and part of the dump truck, which is equivalent to the market value of the victim company 219,002,630 won.

On November 17, 2019, from around 02:40 to around 03:42 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) immediately after driving a Frane vehicle in front of the road near Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) filed 112 reports after setting fire to D freight vehicles parked in the vicinity of the above place; and (c) was fluored into the H Zone in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (d) from around 05:01 on the same day to around 05:18 of the same day, the Defendant was demanded to comply with the request of the Defendant to have been driven under the influence of alcohol by inserting alcohol while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling on the face of the said H Zone from around 05:01 to around 05:17 of the same day.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to put the part of a drinking-free measuring instrument into a drinking-free measuring instrument, and failed to comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking-free measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

" 2020 Gohap6"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Written statements of J.

arrow