logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.04.30 2019고정96
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B knife vehicle.

On September 19, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed that would not be known in the direction of the post office in the Dongcheon-gu, Daejeon District Court. On September 19, 2018, the Defendant continued to drive the said car at a speed that would not be known by one lane in the direction of the post office in the Dongcheon-gu, Daejeon District Court.

Since there is a private street crossing where signal lights are installed, in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely according to the traffic signal to the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the intersection, and violated the marin signal that was conducted in the direction of the National Health Insurance Corporation from the direction of the National Health Insurance Corporation. The Defendant got a part of FK3 car driving in front of the FK3 car, which was driven in the direction of the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. CCTV images from a astronomical book;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is that the defendant, after entering the intersection in yellow finite, was faced with the victim's driver's vehicle entering the intersection in red finite, and the defendant's negligence is considerably high compared to the defendant's negligence.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim is not heavy due to the accident in this case, and the vehicles of the defendant are covered by comprehensive insurance.

Other age, accident, or accident of the defendant.

arrow