Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CRaba and freight cars.

On August 12, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 15:25, and got into the intersection at a speed of about 40 km per hour from the direction of the luminous distance to the intersection of the disease history distance in 12-125, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul.

Since the location is an intersection with a signal, there was a duty of care to check the traffic signal to the person engaged in driving service and prevent the accident in advance by safely driving according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the red signal at the intersection in contravention of the signal, and was driven by the victim D (the age of 57) who proceeded in the direction of the large Tri-distance from the direction of the wind tunnel to the large Tri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri party.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as a pelle managing staff member, who is in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: The fact that traffic accidents have been paid by violating the reason and signal signal of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; the fact that the injured party was serious; the fact that the injured party agreed with the injured party; and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument