A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[2] On July 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern District Court on December 22, 2016.

[2017 Height 1871] The Defendant, around April 11, 2017, was under influence of alcohol in front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul on April 201, 201, when he stopped in front of the victim D ( South, 58 years old) driving, making a stop, and violated the signal of the victim.

The argument did not put the hand over about about 20 minutes.

The Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business of delivering food to the victim by force as above.

[2017 Highest 3643] The Defendant was at around 19:20 on July 16, 2017, at the Ghop house operated by the victim F in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, to avoid disturbance with a large noise due to the Defendant’s 112 report from the Ghop house operated by the Defendant F, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, at around 19:20 on July 16, 201, and was dispatched from the above head of the above head office, but the Defendant was forced to request the Defendant to issue a receipt to the Defendant on the ground of the above head office around 19:55 on the same day, and the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance with a large noise of about 10 minutes on the same day, even though the victim was able to receive a receipt.

The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s heading operation by force as above.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1871]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. On-site photographs (2017 Height 3643);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A summary statement prepared in F (victim before judgment);

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc.;

1. Investigation report (verification of the facts before the same type of crime and the period of repeated crime) (as regards the previous crimes in the judgment, the application of Acts and subordinate statutes shall apply to the evidence of each of the cases 1871 cases);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 27 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;