(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.13 2014구단10342

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.13 2014구단10342

자동차운전면허취소처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 2, 2014, at around 21:25, the Plaintiff, while driving the Seo-gu apartment B (hereinafter “instant apartment”) around 110-dong-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant apartment”) with a blood alcohol content of 0.131%, was damaged to ensure that approximately KRW 200,000,000 of the repair cost is advanced for the victim’s E-learning vehicle parked as the back part of the instant apartment (hereinafter “instant automobile”).

B. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s driver’s license on the ground of the Plaintiff’s drunk driving.

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). 【The ground for recognition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Nos. 1, 2, 1-1 through 3, 3-1, 2, 4 and 5’s evidence Nos. 3-1, 3-2, and 4 and 5’s purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted from around 19:00 on May 2, 2014 to about 21:00, the Plaintiff and the restaurant run the instant apartment to 110 dongs by driving the instant passenger car.

In order to find an empty parking space, a representative officer was 110 parking lots, but there was no parking space.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is called as the plaintiff's parking in consideration of the idea that the time is the most well-known view of the agency's business.

If a proxy engineer leaves the site, the plaintiff was driving a vehicle at 10 to 20 meters and led to the direction of the parking lot adjacent to the passage of 110 east, and found a space adjacent to the parking lot, and was in contact with the vehicle parked next parking space.

Since then, the plaintiff contacted the owner of the damaged vehicle and agreed smoothly with each other, and it was discovered that a person who smokes tobacco in the parking lot was exposed to the police as a drinking driving on the wind reported the plaintiff to the police as suspected of drinking driving.

In the case of the apartment of this case, it is the vehicle of the occupants.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2015.04.02 2014노1804

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.01.25 2017노375

-창원지방법원 2016.09.22 2016노1510

-춘천지방법원 2020.06.02 2020구합50179

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.01 2015고정4053