logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.06.11 2018고단2193
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and 80 hours for quasi-rapes in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 27, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime of May 27, 2018: (a) entered the main points of “D” operated by the victim B in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; (b) despite the fact that the said main points are non-smoking areas, the Defendant smoked; (c) made the customers visiting the place while talking to the said place; and (d) obstructed the business of the said main points operated by the victim by force for about two hours, such as having the beer on the floor of the Defendant’s head, and having the beer on the table, putting the beer on the floor of the Defendant’s head, and having the beer on the floor, putting the beer’s body on the floor, and making the beer on the table,

2. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender to G, etc. who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112 due to the assault case against E, and was transferred to the above F box located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on June 20, 2018, the Defendant spit the spite on the floor of the said box, and carried out the police officers in the said place “spite spite spite spite”, and “spit spite spite spite spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons, etc.”

On the other hand, the Defendant continuously asked the Defendant to refrain from drinking alcohol in order to check the drinking alcohol of the Defendant while the police officer I belonging to the Fabs box, but did not comply with this request, and instead asked the Defendant on the right side side of I by spitation, spitation, and spitation.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of police officers I's crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements;

1. Evidence photographs;

1. The written statement (K);

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Each statement (I, E);

1. Statement (I);

1. Data for the closure of a dynamic image;

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal history records;

arrow