logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.12 2014고단8228
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is North Korean defectors.

The Defendant, along with the same North Korean defectors, introduced them to D, etc. to recruit North Korean defectors who do not have sufficient ability to repay, even if they borrow money without any special property or occupation, and D, etc. made false income data, such as a certificate of employment, using the personal information of the loan clients introduced by the Defendant and C, etc., and offered them with a loan from a installment financing company in the name of the loan requester by using a so-called "vehicle-to-be" method, which disposes of the vehicle, such as so-called "vehicle-to-be", and offered cash to the loan requester in order to collect certain fees and deliver the remainder to the loan requester.

The Defendant, together with C, sent F to D according to the above public offering, upon the request of E, who was requested by the above F to receive the loan of expenses that can be loaned to Germany, with the introduction of E, in which it is impossible to know the character of one source motive in the Geum-hill Station, which is in the 2013 Simbling of the Simbling 2013.

D Based on F’s personal information, F made income data, such as a certificate of employment in the name of limited liability company G, and F made a false statement to F that F would make a payment for each payment on October 17, 2013 at the I agency located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, to the person in charge of loan of the victim Hyundai Capital Capital Co., Ltd. while submitting the above certificate of employment.

However, in fact, F did not work in G, and even if it did not have any other self-sufficiency or occupation, it did not have the intention or ability to pay installments, and it was thought that the vehicle was sold in large lanes through D after purchasing the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, D, and F, deceiving the above victim company and deceiving it from the victim company.

arrow