logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.11.24 2017누5707
국가유공자비해당결정처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for modification or addition of a trial decision as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A corrected or added portion;

A. Of the 6th 17-19th 6th 19th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, the instant difference is not sufficient to recognize that there was a proximate causal link with the after-drugs of drugs during the treatment of 'the cageage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage.’

(b)in addition, between conduct 7, 13 and 14 of the first instance judgment, the following shall be added:

C) The Plaintiff asserts that, if the current ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.

However, the above evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is a honest disorder due to the treatment of the Plaintiff, such as military service or cage cage cageage.

arrow