1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 21, 1983, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged from military service on April 30, 1985.

B. On October 31, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant had been administered at a military hospital due to the left-hand chain injury while serving in the military, and was discharged from military service due to the left-hand chain disorder, and applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the basis of the application for the “slater on the left-hand chain”.

C. On the other hand, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement confirmed the past history of being treated as the caged caged saged saged saged saged at the beds and the left-hand symitis, and decided that it is difficult to recognize that the difference in the application was caused by proximate causal relation with the performance of duties directly related to national security, etc., or that there was a proximate causal relation with other duties or education and training. Accordingly, on April 24, 2015, the Defendant decided that the Plaintiff fell under the category of non-specific requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and the requirements for persons eligible for veteran's compensation.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he had knee-free salt on the left-hand side of his admission but was minor or at least there was no problem in military admission.

However, there is a proximate causal relationship between the difference in the application and the Plaintiff’s performance of official duties, etc., inasmuch as the above-mentioned hepatitis has rapidly deteriorated due to continuous training and work after the Plaintiff entered the military.

Therefore, the Defendant’s disposition of this case is unlawful on a different premise.

(b)the honorable treatment of persons of distinguished service to the State;