Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and a fine of 700,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2016. 8. 31. 22:00 경 진주시 C 지하 1 층에 있는 D 주점에서 피해자 E(48 세) 의 머리채를 잡아당긴 후 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 피고 인의 일행인 F는 발로 피해자의 머리를 1회 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant assaulted the victim jointly with F.

2. 피고인 B 피고 인은 위 일시, 위 장소에서 위와 같은 이유로 시비 도중, E은 주먹과 발로 피해자 A( 여, 57세) 의 얼굴과 가슴을 수회 때리고 걷어차고, 피고인은 주먹과 발로 피해자의 머리를 수회 때리고 걷어찼다.

As such, the Defendant jointly with E, caused the victim to suffer approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. On-site photographs and CCTV closure photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) and Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) (Defendant B) and each fine concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The summary of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. due to joint assault against the victim B among the facts charged in the instant case against the Defendant part dismissing the prosecution of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order against Defendant A is as follows: “When the Defendant was on August 31, 2016, at the D main point located on the first floor above C at Jinju-si, around Jinju-si, around 22:00, the gist of the instant charges is as to why the Defendant “influenced with the examination 48 years.”

“In accordance with the body of the victim, the victim was tightly pushed the victim’s chest, and the victim was assaulted by F in conjunction with F when drinking the victim’s face was taken.”

According to the records, Defendant B and E on August 31, 2016, and Defendant A and F, respectively, were punished by trial costs, and Defendant B and Defendant B, respectively.