logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.04.13 2016나112356
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

Basic Facts

From around September 2005, the Defendant’s construction site acquisition and sale security lender construction company of the instant apartment construction company (hereinafter “large-si construction”) had been performing construction works for the new construction of D apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) on the land level C in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and had completed the structural construction and had suspended the construction due to bankruptcy around December 2008.

The Defendant decided to succeed to and proceed with the construction work on the apartment of this case through consultation with the Korea Housing Guarantee, completed a report on the change of the construction participant with the owner of the apartment of this case from the Korea Housing Corporation, and completed the construction site of this case and performed the remaining construction after taking over the site of the apartment of this case. On October 8, 2013, the Defendant changed part of the finishing materials, such as bathing rooms, unlike the existing design, through design change.

Based on the changed design, the defendant made the public relations center for sale in lots and some of the apartment units of this case as the sampling site and made it public to the general public on October 10, 2013, and made a public announcement of the invitation of occupants on the same day after obtaining approval for the invitation of occupants from the Si of Yanan

The defendant publicly announced the announcement that "the prospective occupant shall be separately constructed with materials equal to or more than the same as the unit unit constructed in the sampling (e.g., color, type, size, and the bath mold) of the bathing room in connection with the public announcement of the indoor bathing room for some apartment buildings already constructed by the lender, because the construction was suspended and the construction was completed for a long time." Thus, the defendant publicly announced the announcement that "the prospective occupant shall fully recognize the completion of the bathing room (including 106 and 902 buildings purchased by the plaintiffs as seen in the front and rear as seen in the above) of the housing unit constructed by the lender, and shall not raise any objection thereto."

Plaintiffs and Defendant .

arrow