A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 111" Defendant was working for D Co., Ltd.

1. Around March 31, 2011, the Defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim at the building site office of the apartment site located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, stating that “the victim would be the friendship of G, the representative of D. The right to operate the restaurant at the construction site of the apartment, which would bring about KRW 10 million a down payment. It is anticipated that the Corporation will proceed from May 201, and if the construction begins, it would immediately allow the site restaurant to be operated.” The Defendant made a contract for consignment operation of the on-site restaurant to the victim.

However, in fact, the defendant was in charge of managing the construction site at the time, and did not have the victim's ability to grant the right to operate the restaurant at the construction site of the above apartment site. At the time, the above apartment site was an auction from 2009, and there was no possibility that the construction work will soon proceed, and there was no need for money to be used at the time, such as living expenses and monthly salary

In the end, the Defendant, as above, was accused of the victim, and received KRW 10 million from the victim as down payment in the same place.

2. Around April 2011, the Defendant against the victim H made a false statement to the victim at the apartment construction site office of paragraph (1) at the end of the apartment construction site, stating, “The victim is G-friendly, the representative of D, and served as the site manager, and the victim would be able to carry out the apartment typry, the household, and the household, on the face of KRW 10,000,000,000.”

However, in fact, the defendant was in charge of managing the construction site at the time, but did not have the intent or ability to cause the victim to do so with regard to the construction of apartment buildings, and there was a need for money to be used for living expenses, employee monthly pay, etc. at the time.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to the post office under the name of the Defendant on May 9, 201.