The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal brought an injury to the victim by beer and beer who is a dangerous thing.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On July 9, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on July 9, 201, the Defendant: (b) collected beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, without any particular reason, and caused injury to the victim by gathering her head from 3:4 times to 3.

B. On July 11, 2011, the victim E submitted a written complaint to the investigation agency against the Defendant. The written complaint stating that “the Defendant was at least twice the head with his/her hair and with his/her illness.” On the same day, the police made a statement that “The Defendant was at least three to four times the head with his/her head with his/her head with his/her hand without any reason.”

2) However, while the victim testified in the court of the court below in the court below, the victim did not see “the defendant was at the time of the defendant’s head, and was not a beer’s disease due to being accommodated in the body.”

The statement was reversed to the effect that the degree of 5 to 6 is the same as beer's disease, not as beer's floor or drinking, and that the beer's shoulder is tight with each other, and that the beer's shoulder is tightly sealed in the table."

On the other hand, the victim was investigated by the police and stated to the effect that "the defendant was able to see the parts of the snow, etc., the right side, the left arms, etc. in the situation where the defendant was fluording the head head of Byung by hand, and the defendant was fluort about how much he would face with the defendant's head without any yellow dust." In light of this, the victim was fluoring the head from the defendant and fluoring the head into the face, face, fluoral side, etc.