A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

around 01:50 on July 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “D” located on the first floor of the building underground in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) caused damage to the refluent nature of the victim by beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table, and caused damage to the victim’s left side part once; and (c) caused damage to two weeks of refluent nature in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. The application, etc. of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs of the victim's upper parts, photographs of the victim's upper parts, 2 photographs of the victim's upper parts, investigation reports (report on the contents of 112 reports), investigation reports (report on the contents of 112 reports), investigation reports (report

1. Relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for conviction: The victim reported to the effect that he was the head of 112 after leaving his head at the scene immediately after the instant case; immediately after being transmitted to G Hospital on the 112 first-lane G Hospital, the victim asked the nurse and doctor in charge to the extent that he was suffering from the head due to the beer’s disease; the victim complained of the two parts and the dizzi business; the victim’s location and form corresponded to the victim’s statement; the victim’s first examination was conducted by the police; the victim did not appear to have been the head of the beer disease, such as the first report; the victim’s head was found to have reached an agreement on the head of the police station; the victim did not appear to have reached an agreement on the head of the 112 first-lane G Hospital; and the victim made a witness’s statement to the effect that he did not comply with the witness’s statement to the effect that he would have resolved the disease.