A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person operating D’s “D,” the victim E(39) is a person operating “G,” the victim H(41) is a person operating “G,” and the victim H(51) is a person operating “I” in the same building as the above G, and the victim J(51) is a person operating “L” in the following part of the said G, and the victim M(51) is a person operating “N” in the same building as the above “L,” and the victim’s O (58) is an employee of the above “G.”

As the Defendant received a subcontract from the victim E and did not receive KRW 5,200,000 from the victim E, the Defendant found it as the above “G”, and had frighted to fire the victim E to receive the price.

On May 15, 2013, at around 18:37, the Defendant sought the “G” and urged the payment of the price to the victim E, but the Defendant was refused from the victim E. In addition, the Defendant’s removal from the victim H was caused by the Defendant’s removal of plastic circulations containing a width of 500 meters, which was prepared in advance on the vehicle driven by the Defendant, into the factory floor of the said “G”, and the removal of a log from the factory site of the said “G”. However, the Defendant’s removal from the victim H was caused by the removal of the log and the removal was avoided.

The Defendant, at the same time, laid a stop in the bruma cremation site. The Defendant was removed from the victim H, but the flame was removed from the floor, and the fire was spreaded to the entirety of the above “G”, which is a factory of 181 square meters in a prefabricated board with a size of 181 square meters in a size of the brupted 181 square meters in the bruth. The Defendant continued to spread to the above “L” and “N”’s outer wall of the building. The Defendant continued to spread to the victim P drady on the victim’s O owned by the above “G.”

Accordingly, the defendant is equivalent to 50 million won at the market price where the victim E and the victim H are in existence.