logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.18 2017가단4865
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,036,938 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from April 25, 2015 to July 18, 2018, and July 19, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 24, 2015, at around 16:48, the Defendant’s insured Party B, driving a private taxi (hereinafter “instant sea vehicle”) and driving the road in front of the Black-distance located in Busan Seo-gu at the seat of the Dong intersection, with black-distance room located in the Dong intersection. On the other hand, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the injury of the Plaintiff’s driver’s bicycle going through the two lanes from the above road to the three lanes (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”), resulting in an accident that shocks the Plaintiff’s bicycle running ahead of the three lanes, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer from the injury, such as the instant injury (hereinafter “the injury”).

B. The Plaintiff was hospitalized in a hospital from April 25, 2015 to May 28, 2015, and from May 28, 2018 to June 1, 2015.

On May 31, 2015, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the right set aside and the e-mail cutting the elevator from the hospital and the hospital in excess of the elevator.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff came from June 1, 2015.

6. Until 30. 30. A hospital was hospitalized.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 4 and 5, Gap evidence 10-1 and 2, Gap evidence 10-2, results of physical appraisal against the plaintiff by Eul, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the fact that the above recognition of liability for damages occurred, the defendant is liable for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the traffic accident of the above vehicle as the insurer of the above vehicle, unless there are special circumstances, since the plaintiff injured the plaintiff due to the operation of the Ga of this case.

3. Scope of damages.

A. The plaintiff alleged that he had earned a monthly average of at least 1,500,000 won while operating a simple restaurant in the Seo-gu Busan metropolitan market, but it is difficult to recognize it only by the statement of Gap evidence 7.

arrow