logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.09.07 2018고단1856
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In using and managing an access medium, no person who is a defendant shall borrow or lend an access medium while requiring or promising to receive compensation, unless otherwise expressly provided for in any other Act;

On December 4, 2017, the Defendant is the head of the liquor company, who is the head of the liquor company, who is the head of the liquor company, and intends to reduce the liquor tax.

On December 5, 2017, upon receipt of a proposal, the account is leased only 3 days, and the account is given KRW 2 million per one, and around December 5, 2017, the head and password connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (Account Number D) in the name of the defendant in the Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and the Kwikset sent the name-based card and password to the non-standing person through Kwikset Services.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

2. In using and managing the access media, no person who is accused B shall borrow or lend the access media while requiring or promising to receive the consideration, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts;

On December 4, 2017, the Defendant is a “E Company F” from a person who is infinite name in a Buddhist land.

The purpose is to reduce the use of the corporate account and to use the personal account in our company due to a large amount of taxes.

On December 5, 2017, he/she received a proposal stating that he/she will use only 3 days per account, and offer 3 million won per account, and sent her name to the account holder via Kwikset Bank service, which was linked to the Nong Bank account (Account Number H) in the name of the defendant in the name of the defendant in Gyeonggi-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation (including attached documents) concerning the defendant B by the prosecution;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation (including attached documents) of the police against the defendant A;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A complaint (including attached documents) of I;

1. A report on internal investigation (a filing of CCTV data for withdrawal from an account);

1. Search and seizure warrant and reply materials (record of evidence);

arrow