logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.07.06 2016고단487
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is the owner of the “D” building in Jeonju-si B.

No person shall provide a place for sexual traffic or provide a building, etc. despite being aware of the fact that it is provided for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from May 2015 to February 12, 2016, received KRW 100,000 per month from two women engaged in sexual traffic while being aware of the fact that they are provided for sexual traffic, and leased two of the above buildings to the above women engaged in sexual traffic, thereby allowing them to engage in sexual traffic.

As a result, the defendant provided a place of sexual traffic or knowingly provided a building for sexual traffic, and provided a building for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on control of public morals establishments (D);

1. Letters;

1. On-site photographs, certified copies of registers, and family relation certificates;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The circumstances in the past are weak in that the defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had the same type of fine, three times before and after the suspension of execution, and one time before and after the suspension of execution under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act;

In that sense, the defendant should be punished strictly, but the defendant has disposed of the building.

and in other words, would not prevent such a mistake.

Taking into account the fact that the sentence is being imposed, the sentence shall be determined as per the order.

arrow