Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has a passbook C with the interest of the chairperson of the election management committee of the Goung-gu apartment B.

1. On July 19, 2016, at the office of the above apartment management office around 16:00, the Defendant: (a) took care of the victim D, who is the above apartment management office, on the ground that he did not cooperate with the Defendant in the Defendant’s business; and (b) took care of the victim D, who is the above apartment management office, on the ground that he did not cooperate with the Defendant’s business; and (c) forced the victim’s management office

2. On July 20, 2016, at the office of the above apartment management office around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim with a large interest; (b) laid down the book of the management office several times on the hand floor; and (c) interfered with the management office of the victim by force.

3. On July 21, 2016, at the office of the above apartment management office around 10:30 on July 21, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the management office operation of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance, such as a disturbance of plastic chairs, on the ground that the victim does not accept the Defendant’s demand that the representative conference room be opened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Application of the police statement protocol (including the G statement protocol) to F

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act (a point of interference with business) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good in light of the form and content of the instant crime, the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, are considered as favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, the Defendant’s primary offender, and the Defendant’s agreement with the victim.