The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances that can be considered in favor of the defendant include the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, and that some victims expressed their intention not to be punished against the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant, together with C or independently, by destroying a locking device at the office or store, and is limited to attempted theft, and it intrudes upon the victim AD greenhouse together with C, driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license for three times, in light of the crime method, content, frequency, result, etc. of the crime, the crime is heavy, and the defendant does not take any particular measures to recover damage; the defendant has a history of being subject to criminal punishment several times due to larceny and non-licensed driving; the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; and all other sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.