The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are that the Defendant’s confessions all of the instant crimes and reflects the mistake, and that the said victims are not punished by the Defendant’s agreement with some victims, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant who intrudes on the victim's residence over 42 occasions and steals or attempted to steals property worth KRW 73 million, and such crime is committed very poor in light of the method, frequency, and degree of damage of the crime. The defendant has a record of criminal punishment several times, including the defendant who was sentenced to punishment for larceny, and commits the crime of this case even during the period of repeated crime due to larceny, and most of the victims have not been recovered yet, and considering all the sentencing conditions in the argument of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, and family environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.