logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.02.06 2014가단32097
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 51,019,155 and interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from January 29, 2015 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s determination on the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim is based on the following: (a) the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with salt color service of KRW 55,419,155 (including value-added tax) upon request from the Defendant from February 2, 2014 to March 2014; and (b) the Defendant paid KRW 4,400,00 to the Defendant on May 3, 2014; (c) there is no dispute between the parties; and (d) the Defendant may be recognized in full view of the purport of the argument in each of the statements in subparagraphs A and 3, and thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the remaining amount of the service and the damages for delay after January 29, 2015, as the date following the Plaintiff’s delivery of the original parts of the service, which was sought by the Plaintiff.

2. 피고의 주장에 대한 판단 이에 대하여 피고는 원고 주장의 염색작업 외에도 2014. 2. 28. 원고에게 MINI ZURRY(미니쭈리) 6,155야드, 용역대금 15,572,150원(부가가치세 포함)의 염색작업도 의뢰하였고, 원고로부터 납품받은 위 MINI ZURRY 원단을 가공하여 A에 의류제품을 납품하였는바, 위 MINI ZURRY 원단의 염색과정에서 발생한 하자로 인하여 A로부터 납품한 의류제품의 반품 등 합계 3억 5,295만 원 상당의 손해를 입었으므로 원고의 이 사건 청구에 응할 수 없다고 주장한다.

The following circumstances are found in light of the statements and images in Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6, namely, ① the Plaintiff’s service payment claim of this case is excluded from KRW 15,572,150, and ② the Defendant processed the above MINI ZU ZRY source supplied by the Plaintiff and supplied Category 5,000 sets of clothing products to A. Although Gap attempted to sell the above clothing products through the ging home shopping, it did not pass the product inspection of the ging home shopping because there were defects such as the raw amount of money, the amount of salary, the due date of payment, delay in payment, etc. in the above clothing products, and thus, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to return the above clothing products and compensate for damages.

arrow