1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the company of this case and the company of this case, “the intervenor,” “the intervenor,” “97Nu2528, 2535,” and “the company of this case,” “the company of this case and “the intervenor,” “the intervenor,” “97Nu2528, 2535,” and “the company of this case and “the company of this case,” “the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance,” and “the company of this case” and “the intervenor,” respectively, are as follows: (b) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 6(8) and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The plaintiff's appeal is justified in the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim, even if the plaintiff's appeal is not significantly different from the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and all of the evidence presented in the court of first instance were examined).2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.