The appeal by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding this case is that the lease contract of this case was explicitly renewed at the end of the third page 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and that it was required from the "food materials and food materials" of the fourth page 6 to the "seven", and that the electronic equipment and food materials, such as the cooling box and card flag, were damaged by 2,00,000 won in total, and that it was used as the evidence Nos. 2, 3, 5, and 7 of the "A" of the 6th page 18 and 19 as the evidence Nos. 2, 3, 5, and 7 of the 6th page 6th page 19 as it was stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) However, the court below's finding of facts and its determination are justifiable in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, and the defendant's grounds for appeal are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance. 2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim on the merits must be dismissed as it is without merit.

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part on the principal lawsuit is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.